Pennsylvania Supreme Court Accuses Far Left Philly DA Larry Krasner of Misrepresenting Cases – Imposes Embarrassing New Rule on Him The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has imposed a new rule requiring the state Attorney General’s Office to review cases where Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner seeks to overturn convictions. This decision stems from accusations of “numerous instances of untrustworthy concessions, lack of candor, misrepresentations of fact, lack of adequate investigation, and avoidance of hearings” by Krasner, which the court deemed “unreliable.” The court stated that Krasner’s actions “do not minister justice, it facilitates injustice” and that the problems are “poised to continue.” This new requirement means the Attorney General will now intervene on behalf of the commonwealth when Krasner attempts to dismiss charges and release individuals from jail.

• Pennsylvania Supreme Court mandates state Attorney General’s review for Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner’s attempts to overturn convictions.
• The court cited Krasner’s “untrustworthy concessions,” “misrepresentations of fact,” and “lack of adequate investigation.”
• The ruling came in the case of Lavar Brown, convicted of murder and sentenced to death row.
• Justices stated Krasner’s actions facilitate injustice rather than administer it.
• The new rule aims to prevent the continuation of perceived problems within Krasner’s office.