The Guardian view on Trump and Lebanon: civilians need lasting peace, not short-term patches Donald Trump’s attempts to de-escalate the conflict in Lebanon are met with skepticism and continued Israeli military action, despite a supposed ceasefire. While a temporary reduction in violence might be achieved, the article argues that short-term patches cannot resolve the underlying chaos and violence unleashed by Israel and the US. Lasting peace requires sustained diplomatic engagement, not just phone calls and social media posts.

• Donald Trump expressed doubt about de-escalation efforts in Lebanon following Israel’s intensified military campaign.
• Israeli drone strikes and Hezbollah rocket/drone launches continued despite attempts at de-escalation.
• A limited deal was suggested where Israel would not strike Beirut’s southern suburbs if Hezbollah refrained from attacking Israel.
• The conflict’s cruelty is evident as discussions of de-escalation occur while a ceasefire is supposed to be in place.
• Israel’s offensive has intensified, causing damage and civilian casualties, while failing to achieve its aims of toppling the Iranian regime or destroying Hezbollah.
• Lebanese civilians are suffering immensely, with a fifth of the population displaced and homes destroyed.
• The article criticizes short-term solutions, advocating for a real peace process with sustained diplomatic engagement.